Skip to content

Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Autonomic Balance: IGEF Study

IGEF measured heart rate variability before and after Somavedic Medic use and classified 8 out of 10 participants as showing improvement. The report presents individual measurements over follow-up periods of 2–28 days.

Combined pilot: intervention protocol, questionnaire outcomes, and findings

IGEF HRV assessment: participants, physiological indicators, and findings

Original document

Study methodology and parameters

Overview of methodology, monitored indicators, and research institution background.

Source

IGEF, International Association for Electrosmog Research

Download (38 pages)
Publication type
IGEF certification report (2014); peer review not identified
Research institution
IGEF; certification seal awarded under a license agreement
Tested device
Somavedic Medic
Study type
Heart rate variability (HRV) research assessment
Investigated cohort
10 participants sensitive to electromagnetic environments, aged 19–67
Comparison methodology
Participants’ own baseline; no sham or separate control group
Observation period
Follow-up over 2 to 28 days
Monitored parameters
Heart rate variability (HRV) and age-referenced autonomic regulation scores

Participants and methods

IGEF assessed 10 participants aged 19–67 who identified as sensitive to electromagnetic environments. They used Somavedic Medic at work or at home. The Stress Pilot Plus system measured heart rate variability (HRV), including respiratory sinus arrhythmia, as an indicator of autonomic regulation.

Each participant’s follow-up readings were compared with their own baseline. Follow-up times varied from 2 to 28 days.

Results

  • IGEF classified 8 out of 10 participants as showing improved HRV. One participant’s endpoint decreased, and one did not show the reported improvement.
  • The report presents individual values and age-referenced classifications. It does not report an aggregate statistical test or a prespecified threshold for improvement.

Study context

Participants were self-selected, and the assessment used their own starting readings rather than a sham or separate control group. Randomization and blinding are not described. HRV was measured; circulation, energy and recovery outcomes were not directly measured.

Source: IGEF certification report, dated 29 August 2014. The certification seal was awarded under a license agreement. Journal peer review and a separate research-funding disclosure are not identified in the report.